The aim of the course is to teach the preeminent principles of administrative jurisdiction law by emphasizing the necessity of admistrative regime, to emphasize the importance of administrative regime to resolve administrative disputes and to acquire the basic administrative jurisdiction law knowledge.
Prerequisite(s)
NONE
Corequisite(s)
NONE
Special Requisite(s)
NONE
Instructor(s)
Assoc. Prof. Mustafa Aytaç ÖZELÇİ
Course Assistant(s)
R.A. Serkan Seyhan
Schedule
Monday, 10.00-11.45, Amphi III
Office Hour(s)
Tuesday and Wednesday, Şirinevler Campus, Room H502-2
m.aytac@iku.edu.tr
Teaching Methods and Techniques
Lecture, discussion, case study, practical work.
Principle Sources
-Oğuz Sancakdar, İdari Yargılama Hukuku, 3. Baskı, Ankara, 2019.
- A. Şeref Gözübüyük, "Yönetsel Yargı", Turhan Kitabevi, 36. Baskı, Ankara, 2017.
- Gürsel Kaplan, "İdari Yargılama Hukuku", Ekin Yayınları, 6. Baskı, Bursa, 2020.
- Ramazan Çağlayan, "İdari Yargılama Hukuku", Seçkin Yayınları, 11. Baskı, Ankara, 2019.
- A. Şeref Gözübüyük, Turgut Tan, "İdare Hukuku Cilt 2, İdari Yargılama Hukuku", Turhan Kitabevi, 9. Baskı, Ankara, 2017.
- Bahtiyar Akyılmaz, Cemil Kaya, Murat Sezginer, "Türk İdari Yargılama Hukuku", Savaş Yayınevi, 4. Baskı, Ankara, 2020.
- Oğuz Sancakdar, Lale Burcu Önüt, Mustafa Aytaç Özelçi, Elif Altınok Çalışkan, Sakine Nilüfer Bilgin, Serkan Seyhan, "İdari Yargı Pratik Çalışma Kitabı", Seçkin Yayınları, 9. Bası, Ankara, 2020.
The preeminent principles of administraive jurisdiction
Oral presentation
3. Week
Organization of administraive jurisdiction
Oral presentation
4. Week
Personnel of administraive jurisdiction
Oral presentation
5. Week
Court of Conflicts
Oral presentation, Case study
6. Week
Administrative Conflicts outside the function of administrative jurisdiction
Oral presentation, Case study
7. Week
Function in administrative jurisdiction
Oral presentation, Case study
8. Week
Prerequisites of action for rescission
Oral presentation, Case study
9. Week
Function, competence, competency, counterparty, term
Oral presentation, Case study
10. Week
Administrative acts
Oral presentation, Case study
11. Week
To file an action with one statement of claim
Oral presentation, Case study
12. Week
The principal causes of action for rescission (five elements and power of discretion)
Oral presentation, Case study
13. Week
The results of action for rescission
Oral presentation, Case study
14. Week
The execution of rescission decisions
Oral presentation, Case study
15. Week
Final Exam
16. Week
Final Exam
17. Week
Final Exam
Assessments
Evaluation tools
Quantity
Weight(%)
Final Exam
1
100
Program Outcomes
PO-1
1. Have the ability to reach and evaluate information sources
PO-2
2. Have the ability to use, compare, interpret, deduce from and apply scientific data
PO-3
3. Have historical knowledge enabling to interpret modern law achievements
PO-4
4. Have the ability to use Turkish efficiently verbally and in written
PO-5
5. Have the ability to follow up professional literature at least in a foreign language
PO-6
6. Have acquired professional and ethical sense of responsibility
PO-7
7. Have the ability to use vocational information technologies efficiently for solution of legal problems
PO-8
8. Have the ability to apply information acquired to solution of a concrete case
PO-9
9. Have full knowledge of legal rules which regulate relationship among natural legal persons and have the ability to interpret such rules
PO-10
10. Have full knowledge of legal rules which regulate relationship between individual and state and have the ability to interpret such rules
PO-11
11. Have the ability to practice the profession as a lawyer who adopts universal principles of law
PO-12
12. Have full knowledge of basic concepts and rules regarding structure and relationship manners of international community; have the ability to interpret and discuss about the foregoing
PO-13
13. Have basic knowledge enabling to evaluate international community’s common issues and their possible solutions
PO-14
14. Have knowledge enabling to apply to human rights bodies having a supranational judicial quality and to follow up the process
PO-15
15. Have knowledge on the European Union (EU) 'Acquis Communautaire' and operation of the EU institutions
PO-16
16. Have a world view enabling to question, criticize and develop law in direction with needs of humanity
PO-17
17. Have knowledge on historical development process of jurisprudence and judicial systems
PO-18
18. Have the ability to solve actual legal problems within the frame of contemporary legal approaches
PO-19
19. Be at the level of understanding and knowledge which reflects all qualities in the best way required by the profession on national and international scale
PO-20
20. Have full knowledge of legal arrangements and practices regarding economic and financial mechanisms
PO-21
21. Have knowledge on historical development of rights of individuals and societies and on basic texts adopted during the process
PO-22
22. Have the ability to express himself individually and before a group
PO-23
23. Have the ability to use, compare, interpret, deduce from and apply scientific data
PO-24
24. Have the ability to follow up regulations and legal quests in order to meet new needs appeared within the frame of relationships between individuals
PO-25
25. Have the ability to cooperate by implementing activities during courses, hypothetical law suits and judicial studies and other vocational and academic visits
PO-26
26. Have the ability to understand and handle national and international dimensions of law, jurisprudence and practices by means of follow up
PO-27
27. Have knowledge of international judicial bodies and their ways of operation
Learning Outcomes
LO-1
Have the ability to learn the importance of administrative jurisdiction.
LO-2
Have the ability to resolve admistrative disputes.
LO-3
Have the ability to learn the necessity of administrative regime.
LO-4
Have the knowledge of comparative administrative jurisdiction law.
