The aim of the lesson is to explore an urban space by its environmental, physical, economical and social dimension. Also in this lesson politics of intercommunication will be evaluated in local and global scale and basic intercommunication concepts will be discussed.
Prerequisite(s)
Corequisite(s)
Special Requisite(s)
Instructor(s)
PROF. DR. EVRİM TÖRE
Course Assistant(s)
Schedule
Office Hour(s)
Teaching Methods and Techniques
Lesson will be taught by examples and visual materials. Student will prepare a presentation and a case study area will be evaluated in the final.
Principle Sources
· APPLEYARD, D., 1981, Livable Streets, Berkeley University of California Press.
· FREUND, P., MARTIN, G., 1996, Otomobilin Ekolojisi, Ayrıntı Yayınları, Istanbul.
· GEHL, J.,GEMZOE, 2004, “Public Spaces Public Life”, Danish Architectural Press, Kopenhag.
· TEKELI İ., 2010, İstanbul ve Ankara İçin Kentiçi Ulaşım Tarihi Yazıları, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
· JACOBS J., 2011, Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı’ , Metis Yayinlari.
· LEFEBVRE, H., 1991, The Production of Space, Çev. N.Smith, Oxford: Blackwell.
· LITMAN, T., 2001 Walking and Bicycle Planning Resources, Victoria Transport Planning Institute, Canada, www.vtpi.org.
· LYNCH, K, 2010, Kent İmgesi, Çeviren: İrem Başaran, İs Bankası Kultur Yayınları.
· SENNET R., 1996, Kamusal İnsanın Çöküşü, Çev; S. Durak ve A. Yılmaz, Ayrıntı, İstanbul.
· SENNETT, R., 1999, Gözün Vicdanı. Kent Tasarımı ve Toplumsal Yaşam, Çev. S.Sertabiboğlu-C.Kurultay, İstanbul, Ayrıntı Yayınları.
- ÜSTÜNDAĞ, K., 2002, İnsan Merkezli Bütünleşik Kentsel Ulaşım Planlama Modeli, Doktora Tezi, MSGSÜ.
Other Sources
· ACAR, İ.H., 1995, ‘Avrupa Kentsel Şartı, Hareketlilik ilkelerinin Türk Kentlerine Uygulanması’ Doktora Tezi, MSGSÜ.
· ACAR, İ.H., 1995, Kentler ve Otomobil, 2. Ulusal Trafikte Güvenlik ve Çağdaş Uygulamalar Sempozyumu, TMMOB Makine Mühendisleri Odası, İstanbul.
· ALEXANDER C., ANNİNOU A, KİNG I., 1980, A New Theory of Urban Design, Oxford.
· ATAUZ A., "Kentler, Yayalık Durumu ve Otomobiller Üzerine Bir Deneme", İnsan Çevre Kent, Dünya Yerel Yönetim ve Demokrasi Akademisi Yayınları, İstanbul 1996.
· BLUMENFELD, H., 1972, The Modern Metropolis, Ed. P. Spreiregen, MIT Press, London.
· BUCHANAN, C., 1981, Bus Priorities in London, Final Report of London Regional Department.
· CARMEN H., 1990, The Pedestrian and City Traffic, Belhaven Press, London and NewYork.
· ÇELIK Z.,FAVRO D., INGERSOLL R., Ç: ALTINOK B., 2007 “Sehirler ve Sokaklar”, Kitap Yayınevi, Ġstanbul.
· COSTA LOBO, M., 2000, Location Guideline, Kentsel Tasarım Sempozyumu, Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
· CROWHURST,S., LENNARD H., 1995, Livable Cities Observed, Gondolier Press Book, California.
· DELEON J., "Bir Tuhaf 'Asansör'", İstanbul, Sayı 7, Ekim 1993.
· Department of Environmental Transportation, 2000, Research Changing The Priorities, London.
· Development in Practice Sustainable Transport, 1996, A World Bank Publication.
· ENGWICHT, D., 1993 , Reclaming our cities & towns: Better Living with Less Traffic, New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
· ERNISH E., HARRISON P., YUVAN J., Transportation Alternatives, 1998, “Streets For People-Traffic Calming In Your Neighborhood”
· European Commission, Directorate-General forthe Environment, 2004 “Reclaiming City Streets For People, Chaos or Quality of Life?”
· FRIEDMAN, S., 1989 , City Moves A Users Guide to Way Cities Work, Mc. Grow Hill, NewYork
· FUNAHASHI, K., 1995 , An Environment – Behavior Studies Perspective on the City, The Wheel Extended, No:3, Japan.
· Gehl Architects& Transport for London, 2003, “London Public Life Survey”, www.gehlarchitects.com
· GRATZ, R., 1994 , The Living City: How America’s Cities Are Being Revitalized by Thinking Small in a Big Way, Washington.
· GÜREL, S., 1995 , Planning and The Science of Human Settlements, Ekistics, July-Aug,Sept-Oct, Now-Dec.
· HAAS-KLAU, C., 1990 , The Pedestrian and The City Planning, Belhaven Press, London-NewYork.
· HAMİLTON, K., HOYLE S., 1992, Moving Cities, Transport Connections Unsettling Cities, Transport Makes and Remakes The City.
· HANS BLUMENFELD, 1996, "Kentsel Ulaşım Sorununun Gerçekleri ve Yalanları", Kent ve Kültürü, Cogito, Sayı 8.
· HOOK, W. Implementig the Kyoto Protokol in the Transport Sector,www.itdp.org/read/KYOTO.doc www.itdp.org/read/KYOTO.doc,
· Institute for Transportation& Development Policy, Gehl Architects, 2010, “Our Cities, Ourselves – 10 Principles for Transport in Urban Life”, New York, http://www.ourcitiesourselves.org/
· JACOBS, J., 1961 , The Death and Life of Great American Cities Random House, New York.
· KANTAR, ÜSTÜNDAĞ, K., 1994 , Bus Priority System in Public Transportation Case Study Topkapı-Aksaray Busway Transit in İstanbul, Master Thesis Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
· KARABAY, H., 1993 , ‘Kentlileşmede Etkin Bir Politika Yayalaştırma ve Araçları’ Kentsel Tasarım Programı,Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İTÜ. İstanbul.
· Kentsel Ulaşım ve Planlama Komisyonu, 2002 , I. İstanbul Kentiçi Ulaşım Şurası İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi.
· KUNTAY, O. 1994 , Yaya Mekanı, Ayıntap Yayıncılık, Ankara, S 53
· KUTLU, K., 1975 , Trafik Tekniği, İTÜ İnşaat Fakültesi, Yollar ve Trafik Kürsüsü Yayınları, İstanbul.
· l. Kentiçi Ulaşım Şurası, birinci 2002 , Kent ve Ulaştırma Planlaması Komisyonu Raporu, İstanbul Büyük Şehir Belediyesi Yayınları, İstanbul
· LASH, S., URRY, J., 1987 , The End of Capitalism, Sage.
· LASH, S., URRY, J., 1994 , Economies of Science and Space, Sage.
· LE CORBUSİER, 2000 , ‘Yol: Doğanın Bağrındaki Plastik Araç’ Cogito, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, Düşünce Dergisi, Sayı 24 Güz, İstanbul.
· LEFEBVRE, H., 1996 , “Right to the City”, Writtings on Cities: Henri Lefebvre, Ed. E.Kofman-E.Lebas, Blackwell Publ.
· LEFEBVRE, H., 1998 Modern Dünyada Gündelik Hayat, Çev. I.Gürbüz, İstanbul, Metis Yayınları.
· LEFEBVRE, H., l991 , The Critique of Everyday Life, ing.Çev.John Moore, Verso.
· LUSHER L.,SEAMAN M., 2008, “Streets to Live By”, Shin-peiTsay, Transalt.org
· LYNCH, K., 1981 , A Theory of A Good City Form, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
· MCNEILL, D., 2000 , “The Concept of Sustainable Development”, Global Sustainable Development in the Twenty First Century, Keekok Lee, Alan Holland, Desmond McNeill Eds Edinburgh University Press.
· MORLOK, E, 1978 Introduction toTransportation Engineering and Planning,Transportation in Society, s,33 Mc Grow Hill
· MUMFORD, L. ‘The Highway and the City’, New York, The New American Library of World Litreature,1964.s.254
· National Consumer Council, A Consumer Review of the Pedestrian Environment, 1987 , What’s Wrong With Walking? Appendix B, London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
· New York City Department of Transportation, 2009, Streets Design Manuel, www.nyc.gov/dot
· New York City Transportation Departmant, Gehl Architect, 2008 “World Class Streets: Remaking New York City’s Public Realm”, New York.
· NYC Streets Renaissance, 2010, Livable Streets- From An Auto- Centric Policy To A City Of Great Streets, www.nycstreets.org
· ORTUZA, J. De D. L., WILLUMSE, G., 1989 , “ Models and Their Role”, Modelling Transport, Wiley, United Kingdom
· Pedestrian Master Plan, 1998 Pedestrian Transportation Program, City of Portland. www.vtpi.org.
· PETERS, D., 1996 , “Habitat II The City Summit; Will it Lead to Sustainable Cities?”, Sustainable Transport, I.T.D.P, Number 6, New York.
· PORTER,C. SUHRBIER,J. SCHWARTZ,W., 1999 , Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel; State of the Practice and Research Needs, TRB Annual Meeting www.nas .edu/trb
· Project for Public Spaces, Inc., 2008, Streets as Places- Using Streets to Rebuild Communities, New York.
· PRYKE, M. MASSEY, D. 1999 Unsettling Cities, Routledge, The Open University
· REPLOGLE, M., 1993 , Traffic Cells: A Key To Producing Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Environment, Presented at TRB Annual Meeting.
· REPLOGLE, M., 1994 , Integrating Transportation Management Strategies, Presented at TRB Conferanceon TDM.
· REPLOGLE, M., 1995 , Evaluating Travel Behavior Effects of Alternative Transportation, Land Use and Urban Design Project. Washington DC. Region.
· REPLOGLE, M., 1995 , Integrating Pedestrian and Bicycle Factors into Regional Transportation Planning Models, Environmental Defense Fund, Transport Forcasting Model CD, USA.
· RUPPERT, W., 1996 , Bisiklet, Otomobil, Televizyon, Kabalcı, İstanbul.
· SENNET, R., 1996 , The Conscience of the Eye: The Design a Social Life of the Cities.
· TEKELİ İ. , OKYAY, T., 1981, Dolmuşun Öyküsü, Çevre ve Mimarlık Bilimleri Derneği Yayınları, İstanbul.
· TEKELİ, İ., 2001 , Modernite Aşılırken Kent Planlaması, İmge Yayınları, İstanbul.
· TEKELI, I., 2002 “Insan Haklarının Yerlesmeye ve Mekana Iliskin Boyutları Üzerine”, Insan, Çevre, Kent, Demokrasi Kitaplığı, Istanbul.
· TEZER, A. 1997 , Kentsel Ulaşım Planlamasında KUP Arazi Kullanımı Ulaşım Etkileşiminin Modellenmesi: İstanbul Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, Doktora Tezi, İTÜ, İstanbul.
· The City Repair Project, 2003, “City Repair’s Placemaking Guidebook”, A.B.D.
· The Sustainable Urban Development Reader, Edited by Stephen M. Wheeler and Timothy Beatley, Routledge, U.S.A.
· TMMOB MO/ŞPO, 2007 Kızılay’da Yayalar ve Yaya Ulaşımı: Sorunlar, Sebepler, Süreçler
· Transport Research Board, 1997 , The Role of Transit in Creating Livable Metropolitan Communities, TCRP Report 22, National Academy Press, New York.
· Transportation Alternatives, 2009, “I Walk in My Street- A Guide to Planning Successful Pedestrian Streets in New York City”, New York
Course Schedules
Week
Contents
Learning Methods
1. Week
Concept of intercommunication, planning and designing relation
Presentation – seminar - discussion
2. Week
Relations between intercommunication, traffic, spatial development
Presentation – seminar - discussion
3. Week
Relations between intercommunication and sustainability
Presentation – seminar - discussion
4. Week
Politics and strategies of sustainable intercommunication; Examples from Turkey and world
Presentation – seminar - discussion
5. Week
Spatial examples of sustainable intercommunication
Presentation – seminar - discussion
6. Week
Strategies of planning intercommunication and social consciousness
Strategies of intercommunication and urban development; mix use model, smart cities model, pedestrian access and accessibility
Presentation – seminar - discussion
10. Week
Intercommunication models
Presentation – seminar - discussion
11. Week
Case study and analyses
Technical tour
12. Week
Case study and evaluation
Technical tour
13. Week
Case study and evaluation
Technical tour
14. Week
General discussions and presentations
Presentation – seminar - discussion
15. Week
General discussions and presentations
Presentation – seminar - discussion
16. Week
Evaluating design, management, planning and intercommunication
Discussion - invited participants
17. Week
Final exam
Assessments
Evaluation tools
Quantity
Weight(%)
Program Outcomes
PO-1
Having knowledge to produce critical and original work in the fields of architectural theory, design methods and design philosophy. (KNOWLEDGE)
PO-2
Having knowledge to produce critical and original work in the fields of social and cultural geography and on the concepts of space and time. (KNOWLEDGE)
PO-3
Having knowledge to produce critical and original work in the field of built environment and human/society relationship within the framework of human-environment-behaviour. (KNOWLEDGE)
PO-4
Ability to direct the experience gained from architectural design and other knowledge areas to new fields and generate strategies. (ABILITY)
PO-5
Ability to conduct research, examination, interpretation; to use adequate techniques and produce original results in the field of academic knowledge and design process. (ABILITY)
PO-6
Ability to use the theoretical and practical knowledge of architectural design referring to undergraduate competence. (ABILITY)
PO-7
Competence for analyzing and interpreting architectural products within the framework of architectural concepts. (COMPETENCE)
PO-8
Competence for relating architectural design, architectural theory and building construction with social sciences and humanities such as psychology, philosophy and political economy. (COMPETENCE)
PO-9
Competence for presenting a work - made individually or in a group- systematically, in a foreign language, using the required computer programs, verbal, written and visual. (COMPETENCE)
PO-10
To gain knowledge and understand the socio-economical and spatial components and processes which are both the subjects and the outcomes of an urban design project.
PO-11
To gain knowledge and critical awareness about the relations in between urban design and the other disciplines like architecture, urban planning, economy and sociology; and the opportunuties and threats that will arise by these relations.
PO-12
Ability to realize an urban design project or a research on urban design in a multidisciplinary process, using both the theoretical and practical knowledge infrastructure, developing new methods and techniques.
PO-13
Ability to direct socio-economical and spatial components and processes in the urban design process.
PO-14
To gain competency on conducting an indivudial research or project on urban design.
PO-15
To gain competency on working as a group member and to work out the complicated processes that will occur during the urban design.
PO-16
To gain competancy to produce an original academical/scientific research, to present and to discuss in a dialectical framework.
PO-17
To gain competency on strategical decision making as a component of the urban design project and to produce original solutions considering ethical values.
PO-18
Understanding time management and control, cost planning and control, risk management, approaches, models and techniques to improve organizational / management effectiveness in project and construction management.
PO-19
Understanding classic and contemporary management theories and human relationship in management to improve management effectiveness in beginning, design and construction processes of a project.
PO-20
Ability to direct the experience gained from construction management and technology to new fields and ability to generate strategies.
PO-21
Ability to transfer and apply knowledge according to construction management and technology to the beginning of project, design and construction processes.
PO-22
Competence for analyzing, interpreting and establish relations within the framework of construction management and technology with the project and construction process.
PO-23
Competence for making strategic decisions of architectural design projects, in the field of construction management and technology, and generating original solutions.
PO-24
Understanding the basic principles of structural systems, development and appropriate application of contemporary structural systems.
PO-25
Understanding managerial tasks of architect and approaches, models and techniques to improve effectiveness in project and construction management.
PO-26
Understanding the relationship between sub systems which forms entire building and building technology, to ensure effective and correct use of a complex building from the beginning of design process to the usage, and ability to be able to criticize them.
PO-27
Ability to transfer and apply knowledge according to architectural engineering, to the beginning of design and construction processes of a project.
PO-28
Competence for producing a comprehensive architectural project from the beginning of schematic design to detailed system development phase (structural and environmental systems, safety and fire protection, partition systems, building envelop, building service systems).
PO-29
Competence for making strategic decisions of architectural design projects, in the field of architectural engineering, and generating original solutions.
PO-30
To have advenced level knowledge and realization about two different scale monument and site conservation.
PO-31
To have advenced level knowledge and realization about basic issues of conservation which are restoration theories, international modern conservation principles, national and international legal and organizational regulations and recording cultural heritage.
PO-32
To have advenced level of knowledge and realization about design principles of new addition to the historic building and infill building in historic settlement, measured drawing, restitution and restoration projects of historic building.
PO-33
To be informed and own critical awareness for utilizing from national and international examples of conservation of historical sites that are rapidly disappearing, preparing analytical surveys, preparing morphology and typology study and evaluating the data reunited from these studies.
PO-34
To gain cognitive and practice knowledge for proficiency in practice about monument and site conservation.
PO-35
To apply and integrate the knowledge, conception and problem solving ability about monument and site conservation with the knowledges from architectural history, city planning, urban design, archeology, civil engineering and such discipline areas and to apply within interdisciplinary, multi-disciplinary and upper-disciplinary contexts.
PO-36
To develop new data and methods on monument and site conservation and to have ability for merging the gained knowledge with the knowledge from the other discipline areas.
PO-37
To have ability for performing research, survey and critical evaluation on academic knowledge and design process, using approprate technics and producing unique outcomes.
PO-38
To have ability for carrying out individual study on monument and site conservation.
PO-39
To have ability for making a decision in analysis stage about monument and site conservation area, to lead projects/academic studies, to produce a work in a group by taking individual responsibility and to have ability for leading and changing complex processes.
PO-40
To have ability for taking strategic decisions about monument and site conservation projects and concerning ethic values while producing unique solutions.
Learning Outcomes
LO-1
Analyzing and informing intercommunications socio-economic and spatial processes.
LO-2
Have an artifice to team work about intercommunications inter disciplinary dimension.
LO-3
Improving the explanation skill about current dynamics of urban space
LO-4
Having a competence for to evaluate and method improve techniques
LO-5
Gaining holistic perception rather than discrete solutions
